Autologous fat, implants, Macrolane … what is the best option?

There are many people who after dedicating hours and hours to the gym and sports activities do not obtain the expected results to develop the twin. Also people who, for aesthetics, are not satisfied with the shape of this muscle. Now, thanks to aesthetic medicine, there are treatments that allow to increase its size according to the patient’s tastes.

There are several techniques for achieving twin augmentation, each with its own pros and cons. In this article we will talk about methods based on autologous fat implants, silicone implants and Macrolane.

Autologous fat

This technique is based on the patient’s own fat implantation in the calf area . For this, a small liposuction is performed and the fat is processed to obtain only that which has live adipocytes.

The main advantage offered by this method is that the compatibility is maximum, since it is the patient’s own fat and there is little risk of rejection .

The great negative aspect that occurs with this technique when increasing the calves is that the autologous fat does not fit very well in the calves and, generally, a silicone prosthesis must be implanted in them so that they fit well after the operation. On the other hand, it should be noted that to perform such a transplant, the patient must have enough fat. The main problem is that people who use this method tend to have a low body fat index.

Implants

The calf implant works the same as the implant in any other area of the body such as, for example, the breasts. This technique consists of the introduction of a silicone prosthesis to give the muscle shape and thickness .

In general terms, the increase of twins through implants is a very effective treatment that leaves a high degree of satisfaction in the clients. Today silicone is one of the most studied materials in medicine, so the degree of compatibility is high and the rejection rate very low.

As with any implant operation, there are risks . In the case of twin augmentation through implants, the most common are:

• Displacement of the prosthesis
• Excessive bleeding during the first postoperative days
• Risk of weakening the muscles in the areas near the prosthesis

Macrolane

Macrolane recently arrived in aesthetic medicine as a revolutionary filler. It is a substance (hyaluronic acid gel) that is injected to shape and contour the different parts of the body .

The main advantages of this treatment include:

• Goodbye to cuts and scars: the liquid is introduced by injection
• It is a pure gel, so it is free from causing any type of infection or allergic reaction

However, the great disadvantage that this treatment offers is in the duration of the results. Macrolane is a gel that, approximately two years after injecting, is reabsorbed by the body . Therefore, we are facing a treatment in which the effects are temporary.

What method to choose?

We have tried to bring you closer to the advantages and disadvantages of each method. As in every treatment in which there are several intervention options, it is your decision and that of your doctor that is the most important when choosing. Do not hesitate to consult your trusted doctor for the solution that best suits you.