Similarities and differences between bioplasty and fillers

Bioplastic is a technique that consists of implanting materials tolerated by the body, for the augmentation of certain areas of the body and face, without surgery. It is for this reason that it is often confused with one more filling technique, and it is necessary to clarify the differences.

A few decades ago to want to perfect facial or body areas, one had to go to surgery or depend on masks and what nature offers us, especially when wrinkles or aesthetic imperfections such as flaccidity were presented, instead, now the use of Substances has become the most popular treatments and the perfect alternative to escape the aftermath of time.

To start, let’s remember that the fillers that are currently used to improve aesthetics are: hyaluronic acid and botox; Due to their popularity, we know what each of them consists of and the effects it brings to our body.

But, maybe labioplasty is not so familiar to you, that’s why we share the following:

Bioplastic is a technique that is also capable of correcting and shaping specific areas of the body and face, thus giving the person the opportunity to have the change they have always wanted.

In order not to generate dissatisfaction with other aesthetic procedures or treatments, we can share that all of them do indeed offer first-rate results, some are designed only for a body or facial area; Others are based on implants or fillers that increase the volume of certain body areas, but now you can count on a new technique that improves the volume of the body and facial areas without the need to go through the operating room and postoperatively. labioplasty.

To understand a little, bioplastic is a minimally invasive technique, does not require a scalpel or sutures, and what is even better, after its application the patient will not have to deal with their scars. Bioplastic is applauded for its great results, being recommended for its results that adhere to those of conventional cosmetic surgery.

In itself, both fillers and labioplasty work to combat the effects of aging; but, despite there being similarities, there are also differences between the two.

Differences between labioplasty and other fillers

Now yes, the main differences between both treatments:

• Bioplastic was born from filling techniques, but it is more than that. Bioplastic is injected in deep layers, unlike fillers that are injected under the skin. This makes it possible in labioplasty to create shapes and influence angles.
• Bioplastic can generate new lines that are more harmonious and that beautify the face drawing.
• The material injected into the labioplasty is not absorbed over time, unlike, for example, hyaluronic acid.

Similarities between both techniques

• Both treatments are minimally invasive and do not leave scars in the area where it is placed.
• The materials that are injected are organic and non-toxic.
• To perform the treatments, local anesthesia is needed and the postoperative period is quick, so much so that when leaving in a few hours, normal life can be carried out.
• Depending on the area where the treatment is performed, it may vary, but in both techniques, it takes about half an hour and an hour and a half to perform the treatment.
• The two techniques are used to fight age, fight wrinkles, to increase the size of some areas (lips, cheekbones, buttocks).
• It is possible to correct the shape of the areas that make up the face so that there is balance in it
• Both fillers and labioplasty are used to give greater volume to the desired areas, which can be: the buttocks, legs, cheekbones, and lips.
• As they are not surgery, they are cheaper techniques, with similar results.
• For the application of both techniques, the substance is injected into the area to be treated to give a greater volume or fill
• Abas substances are compatible with the body, so there is no risk of rejection, infections, or allergies
• The substances are injected through microcannulas, so the process is simple, fast, and painless.
• In its application the use of anesthesia is not used, it is only enough with creams that numb the area where the substance is injected
• The postoperative period is practically quick, which means that the patient can immediately return to their daily activities.
• Regarding the times of each session and of the treatment, everything will depend on the results that the patient expects and the state of the area to be treated. The duration takes an estimated time of 45 minutes in terms of treating facial areas. In the body parts, it can take an hour or an hour and a half.

As has been observed, between the two techniques there are many more similarities than differences. Bioplastic, despite being a novel technique, is increasingly in demand and is increasingly used among celebrities. If we look at old photos of these celebrities, who naturally have a perfect face, we will see that there are many differences.

Something else about labioplasty:

Bioplastic is also considered the perfect ally to treat what aging is marking, but it is also a technique that is used to treat various facial and body areas in terms of volume. Example the following:

• Chin
• Nose
• Buttocks
• Furrows of the face (fine lines)
• Cheekbones
• Mandible

Due to its wide benefits, both labioplasty and fillers are the aesthetic procedures that are most requested. The only characteristic that makes them different is that one will allow you to visualize permanent results while the other will not, because in fillers such as hyaluronic acid) the effects tend to disappear over time, which implies requesting new sessions. But what is clear is that all people who want volume, reduce signs of aging, can access both treatments.

Do not forget to go to the best aesthetic doctor, who is an expert in fillers and labioplasty, always investigate before going.