Amber Heard and the annoyance it caused in the jury of her trial against Johnny Depp

One of the seven members of the jury who witnessed the intense exchange of reproaches and accusations between Amber Heard and Johnny Depp, during his media trial for defamation, spoke about the “discomfort” that the apparent theatricality shown by the American artist.

The Heard – Depp trial ended with a verdict that attacked the credibility of the artist and underlined her intention to damage the reputation of her ex-husband with slanderous and distorted information.

“The crying, the facial expressions he had, the fact that he was staring at us. All of this made us very uncomfortable,” said the person, whose identity was not disclosed, in a conversation with the Good Morning America program.

“He would answer a question and start crying. And two seconds later he would turn cold as ice… Some of us thought it was crocodile tears,” he said in the morning on ABC.

Judge Penney Azcarate ruled that the names of the seven members of the jury, five men and two women, should be kept in the strictest secrecy even when the process had already concluded, all in order to protect them from the heated debates and parallel trials that They continue to populate social networks.

However, the one who dared to talk to television did not hesitate to “add more fuel to the fire” of that image crisis that Amber is experiencing, assuring that the general feeling in the panel was skepticism about her allegations.

“We consider that, ultimately, what he said seemed more credible. He seemed more transparent when answering questions. On an emotional level, he was much more stable than her,” he added in his talk.

By way of conclusion, the anonymous interviewee expressed his conviction that the physical and psychological abuse that the two artists confronted each other during the oral hearings was “mutual.”

However, he also maintains that, in the absence of conclusive evidence to support Heard’s position, judicial logic said that the accusations he made against Johnny in his 2018 op-ed constituted a clear exercise in defamation.

“Ultimately, what I think is true is that they both mistreated each other. But if it really did reach the level that she exposed, there was no evidence to prove those particularly serious accusations,” he concluded.